Here I attempt to rank and summarise the most pertinent principles (and values) in today’s AI Ethics.

<aside> <img src="https://prod-files-secure.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/5bf8f97c-b948-4af2-b064-edfc74b18e1f/f0d2d963-fd9a-42ea-ac2b-1cbd714621bb/BBX_Heart-Box-Gold-SmlBG-280w.png" alt="https://prod-files-secure.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/5bf8f97c-b948-4af2-b064-edfc74b18e1f/f0d2d963-fd9a-42ea-ac2b-1cbd714621bb/BBX_Heart-Box-Gold-SmlBG-280w.png" width="40px" /> This work is licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

</aside>

Introduction

We still need “principles to practice”

Going into 2024, the world of ethical AI (and Tech Ethics more generally) still suffers from a glut of guidelines and a dearth of solutions. In other words, it’s all fart and no shit.

Go take a look. It’s not hard to find the conceptual, philosophical groundwork on which AI Ethics is being built – lists of values, principles, frameworks, etc. – but I frequently hear people calling for practical tools and processes for how to actually apply it. There is still a great need for resources to help us apply moral philosophy to the actual ones-and-zeros of building and managing digital technologies.

Nevertheless, I hope the list below will be of use in your AI Ethics efforts, as a kind of building block on which to stack more detailed, specific and applicable work.

The stack sorta kinda maybe looks something like this. Thanks to Adobe Firefly for the sci-fi-fantasy pyramid image, and textstudio.com for the 3D font.

The stack sorta kinda maybe looks something like this. Thanks to Adobe Firefly for the sci-fi-fantasy pyramid image, and textstudio.com for the 3D font.

A starting point for your ethical AI policy

It can be hard to know where to set off when designing policy and methods for ethical technology. One of the most fundamental (and, I think, accessible) layers in the edifice is principles and values. The idea is that you can select those principles/values that are most important or relevant to your context of operation, prioritise them, then use this refined list as a framework on which to develop your processes, rules, products etc.

This process is at the heart of Value-based Engineering, which I learned about from a master, Sarah Spiekermann, while collaborating with her and others on the new global standard based on that process: IEEE 7000. Here’s a paper outlining some of the concepts: Value-based Engineering for Ethics by Design.

<aside> ⚠️ But are these “principles” or “values”? Either. Both. Take your pick. There are semantic differences between principles, values and other similar words, but for the scope of this (high-level) project, I’m lumping them together.

</aside>

Ranked: Top Principles for Ethical AI

Okay, let’s get to the meat of this particular sandwich.

I gathered a bunch of broad-reaching and reputable lists of ethics principles, as they apply to modern technology, particularly AI. Some were standalone lists, while others were meta-analyses of many other underlying lists. Then I roughly (and somewhat unscientifically) condensed them into a ranked list of the top principles.

This got me to a list of 103 principles. I then tried my best to group them into common terms. I had to use a little creative licence but tried to maintain the spirit of each principle while also shortening the overall set. This was the result:

Rank Principle Occurences Description
1 transparency 14 Includes: explainability, interpretability, provability, openness, shareability, ethical explainability / "ethical black box".
2 accountability 12 Includes: control, responsibility, human-only (not machine) responsibility.
3 security 10 (Very broad!) includes: safety, robustness, physical & cyber security.
4 fairness 10 Includes: debiasing, non-discrimination, fair distribution, equality, equitability, objectivity.
Overlaps with: justice, inclusivity, autonomy, transparency.
5 justice 9 (Very broad!) Includes: human rights, governance, fair & equal legal protection, lawfulness, respect for law, regulatory & legal compliance, banning malevolent AI (e.g. AI arms race).
6 privacy 8 Includes protection (e.g. data protection).
7 human-centred 7 Includes: agency, humanity-first, human values first, multi-stakeholder collaboration, human-centred design/development.
8 beneficence 6 Includes: common good, sustainability, (prioritising) well-being.
9 non-maleficence 5 Includes: misuse, proportionality, do no harm, limiting impact.
10 inclusivity 5 Includes: collaboration, solidarity, social cohesion.
Overlaps with: human-centred.
11 quality 4 Includes: reliability, accuracy, awareness, literacy, informed by science & technology.
12 human oversight 4 Includes: human determination, control, auditing.
13 sustainability 3 Could be both "technical & business sustainability" (maintaining systems) as well as "ecological sustainability" (minimising carbon footprint, etc.)
14 autonomy 2 Includes: freedom
15 respect 2 Includes: dignity, respect for persons.
16 trust 1 Could arguably be part of "quality" but I left this alone because "trust" has a big place in moral philosophy yet it only occurred once by itself.
17 AGI 1 Only one occurrence of automated general intelligence ("AGI") which could be considered an "AI Safety" issue but is perhaps broader than that.

About the source data

<aside> ℹ️ Here’s my source data, including links to the publications: ‣

</aside>

Notably, all five of the meta-analyses I found were also covered in this article: The Proliferation of AI Ethics Principles: What’s Next?, from Montreal AI Ethics Institute (2021), so it deserves a mention.